War Czar?

We now have a War Czar. A man who is the “point man” for the wars (fiascos) in Afghanistan and Iraq. I guess the pressure was too much for Bush, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Defense Secretary, and all the other generals off in foreign lands. We were able to fight WWII without a “war czar” So why do we need yet one more “point man” ?

The reason is that Bush wants someone else to be the target of scorn when his fiasco’s go awry. Bush is a tough talking cowherd. He flinches and recoils from all real responsibility, braking most things he touches despite all this sanctimonious good intentions.

So the RMS Titanic has a “sinking Czar” now all aboard can be assured that the “sinking Czar” will handle things. Of course the ship is doomed and 1500 people will die because of the stupidity of the planning behind the construction of the ship, but hey they have Czar.

At least the poor Russians new what to do with a Czar.

But then again maybe the War Czar will be as successful as the Drug Czar? We won the war on drugs right? I think what Bush really needs is an Impeachment Czar, otherwise known as a special prosecutor to get him and his incompetently evil scumbags to jail where he belongs.